Measure
Define the audience, intent, prompt set, model, date and observation schema. Establish a baseline before drawing conclusions.
AI Search / Methodology
Search is changing how people discover, compare and choose products. I study what AI systems retrieve, what they cite, what they say and where the evidence breaks down.
The working cycle
Define the audience, intent, prompt set, model, date and observation schema. Establish a baseline before drawing conclusions.
Inspect missing context, ambiguous entities, unsupported claims and differences between source evidence and generated answers.
Propose clearer category language, product boundaries, structured comparisons and accessible source material.
Repeat controlled observations. Look for consistent changes without assuming a single prompt proves causality.
Show what was observed, what was inferred, what changed and what remains unverified.
Measurement matters
Traditional search rankings cannot be copied directly into generative search. A response may mention a brand without citing it, cite a page without recommending it, or recommend a product using incomplete information.
Does the entity appear in an answer to a relevant, predefined question?
Which sources are explicitly referenced, and do they support the claims made?
Is the product suggested for a particular use case, and with what qualifications?
Are descriptions supported by current evidence, and do they hold across repeated observations?
A practical distinction
"Notion is one of several tools teams use to organize work."
Brand presenceThe name appears. There is no evidence here that the system prefers it for the user's needs.
"For a team prioritizing connected notes and documentation, consider Notion; verify the current integration and security requirements before deciding."
Qualified recommendationThe answer connects a product to a use case, but still needs source and accuracy checks.
Illustrative examples written for this page, not observed model outputs or measured results.
Applied work
A public-source baseline, an intervention register and original examples. Proposed changes are clearly distinguished from deployed outcomes.
Read the case study ↗02 / Cross-platform comparisonA 35-prompt protocol and competitor evidence matrix designed for future repeatable observations. No invented AI results.
Read the study ↗A framework is not a measured outcome. A public product page is not proof of what an AI model will answer. And an observed difference is not automatically the result of an optimization. Keeping those distinctions clear is part of the work.
Explore all projects →